ClickBrainiacs
5.8/10

Score Breakdown

5.5 Detection Capability
6.5 Ease of Setup
5.5 User Experience
8.0 Value for Money
4.0 Customer Support
6.5 Reporting & Analytics
4.5 Platform Coverage

Strengths

  • Longest free trial in the comparison — 12 months, no credit card
  • Lowest starting price ($15–29/mo) in the 22-tool comparison
  • No-script bot detection for visitors with JavaScript disabled
  • Automatic unblocking when threat subsides (false positive awareness)
  • Historical data visualization and analytics-first positioning
  • Manual controls alongside automation for experienced PPC managers
  • White-label reseller program for agencies

Weaknesses

  • Zero verified user reviews on G2, Capterra, Trustpilot, SourceForge — unprecedented after ~10 years
  • Website appears dormant (still references "AdWords")
  • No API access; limits programmatic integration
  • Residential address registration in Bucharest; unfunded, unscaled
  • Google Ads only; no social platform protection
  • No session recordings, call tracking, CRM integrations, or conversion attribution

Who Is This Tool For?

ClickBrainiacs targets small businesses and freelancers running Google Ads campaigns who want basic click fraud protection without the price tag of established competitors. The emphasis on analytics and data visualization positions it toward users who want to understand their fraud patterns rather than simply block them — the kind of advertiser who'd rather study the dashboard than set-and-forget.

The white-label licensing program also targets agencies and resellers who want to offer click fraud protection under their own brand in specific geographic markets.

If you're looking for a proven, heavily validated solution backed by thousands of active users, this isn't it. If you're curious about a budget tool with a generous trial and don't mind being an early adopter with limited community support, ClickBrainiacs at least lets you test for a year before paying anything.

Company Background

ClickBrainiacs was founded in 2015 by Sorin Vîlcea and operates from Romania. The registered contact address is a residential apartment in Bucharest (Sos. Colentina nr 53, bl 59, ap 36, Sector 2). According to Tracxn, the company has raised zero external funding and ranks 1,569th among 2,100 active competitors in the click fraud space.

The underlying software platform is called WiseVision, and the contact email (andrei.revenco@wisevision.ro) points to a separate entity from the ClickBrainiacs brand itself. The .com site serves the international software product, while ClickBrainiacs.ro operates as a Romanian digital marketing agency offering SEO, Google Ads management, Facebook Ads campaigns, CRO, and ROI optimization. The agency page emphasizes direct sessions with the founder.

This dual identity — marketing agency that built a side product — is worth understanding. ClickBrainiacs wasn't conceived as a venture-backed software company. It grew from an agency practitioner's frustration with click fraud on client campaigns. That origin story is neither unusual nor damning — several tools in this comparison started similarly. But unlike competitors who subsequently attracted investment, built teams, and scaled their user base, ClickBrainiacs appears to have remained a small operation.

The company also runs a white-label licensing and reseller program, offering the complete software solution under partner brands. Per-website pricing runs from €6/website (1–100 sites) down to €4/website (400+ sites), with geographic market exclusivity available. At time of research, Poland, Latvia, and Romania were listed as unavailable markets due to existing exclusivity agreements.

The Technical Engine: What Powers the Detection?

ClickBrainiacs/WiseVision uses a JavaScript-based tracking system that monitors website visitors and ad clicks in real time. The technical approach includes several components.

JavaScript tracker

A tracking code installed before the closing HEAD tag on all website pages collects visitor data including IP addresses, geographic location, click frequency, session duration, and behavioral patterns. The system claims real-time monitoring and reporting.

No-script tracking

This is one genuinely interesting feature. ClickBrainiacs includes tracking for visitors who have JavaScript disabled, which can identify certain types of bots that operate without JavaScript capabilities. Most competing tools depend entirely on JavaScript execution, meaning they can miss this category of bot traffic. However, without user reviews or independent testing to validate effectiveness, this remains a theoretical advantage.

Fingerprint detection

The tool tracks visitor digital fingerprints and claims to block users when they attempt to switch IP addresses — the same cat-and-mouse problem every click fraud tool faces. How sophisticated this fingerprinting is compared to competitors who analyze 800+ data points (ClickPatrol) or 4,000+ data points (fraud0) is unknown.

Automatic IP blocking and unblocking

Once a fraudulent IP is identified, the system automatically blocks it across all active Google Ads campaigns via the Google Ads API (connected through MCC). The unblocking capability is notable — it suggests the system can recognize when previously blocked IPs should be re-allowed, reducing false positive damage. Few competitors emphasize the unblocking side.

Custom rules engine

Users can create up to five excessive clicking rules, defining specific conditions that trigger blocking. This provides some customization for businesses with particular fraud patterns, though five rules is fewer than competitors like ClickGUARD (which offers extensive custom rule sets) or even Click Guardian (which also allows five but at a higher price point).

Manual controls and email alerts

Beyond automation, users can manually block and unblock IP addresses. The system sends notifications when IPs click more than once on ads or when IPs get excluded, creating a passive monitoring layer for busy advertisers.

What's notably absent from the technical description is any mention of AI or machine learning in the company's own materials. Some third-party listing sites describe ClickBrainiacs as using "advanced algorithms and machine learning," but the company's actual website language is more modest — referring to "automatic procedures" and rule-based blocking. This honesty is refreshing compared to competitors who claim AI capabilities that amount to basic threshold rules, though it also suggests the detection engine may be less sophisticated than market leaders.

Features Breakdown

Core detection and blocking

  • Real-time JavaScript monitoring across all website pages
  • No-script/JavaScript-disabled bot detection
  • Fingerprint tracking across IP changes
  • Automatic IP blocking via Google Ads API (MCC connection)
  • Automatic IP unblocking when threat subsides
  • Manual IP blocking and unblocking
  • Up to 5 custom excessive clicking rules

Reporting and analytics

  • Real-time reporting dashboard
  • Historical data analysis and trend visualization
  • Click frequency analysis, geographic location tracking, IP address pattern monitoring
  • Session duration tracking
  • Strong positioning on data visualization and historical analysis for stakeholders

Alerts and notifications

  • Email alerts for suspect IPs and blocked IPs
  • Configurable alert thresholds

What's missing compared to competitors

  • No session recordings or visitor replay
  • No call tracking
  • No competitive intelligence
  • No social platform protection (Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok)
  • No API access (confirmed by multiple sources)
  • No CRM or marketing automation integrations
  • No native Zapier/webhook connectivity
  • No mobile app SDK
  • No affiliate fraud module
  • No conversion tracking or attribution
  • Limited to Google Ads (some sources claim Bing Ads support, but unverified)

Setup and User Experience

Setup follows the standard pattern for this category: create a free account, add your website(s), install a JavaScript tracking code on all pages before the closing HEAD tag, and connect your Google Ads account via MCC.

The ClickPatrol comparison article notes that ClickBrainiacs "is more complex and may need technical expertise" compared to simpler competitors, and that it's "a more complex platform" better suited for users comfortable with advanced settings. This aligns with the analytics-heavy positioning — the tool prioritizes depth of data over simplicity of operation.

No verified user reviews exist to confirm or deny the actual setup experience. The company's own documentation suggests a straightforward process, but every click fraud tool says that.

The dashboard reportedly emphasizes data visualization — charts, graphs, and trend analysis of fraud patterns over time. For advertisers who need to present fraud data to clients or stakeholders (particularly agency users), this analytics-first approach could be valuable. But again: zero independent confirmation of dashboard quality exists.

Pricing

Pricing information for ClickBrainiacs is inconsistent across sources, likely reflecting updates over time that haven't been uniformly captured.

  • SaaSworthy (last updated May 2021): Starts at $15/month
  • Source dataset: Starts at $29/month
  • ClickPatrol comparison: Describes ClickBrainiacs as "more expensive" (relative to ClickPatrol's $59/mo starting point)
  • White-label reseller pricing: €4–6 per website per month

Free trial: 1 YEAR. This is the most generous trial period in the entire 22-tool comparison by an enormous margin. Most competitors offer 7–14 day trials. ClickBrainiacs gives you twelve months. No credit card required.

On one hand, a year-long trial shows confidence in the product's ability to prove its value over time. Click fraud patterns are seasonal and cyclical — a seven-day trial during a quiet period might miss the fraud that hits during peak season. A year-long trial captures the full picture.

On the other hand, an excessively generous trial can also signal a product struggling to convert free users to paying customers. When you can't demonstrate value quickly enough to justify a 7–14 day trial conversion, extending to a year might be less confidence and more desperation. Without conversion rate data or user testimonials, both interpretations remain valid.

Verified Review Analysis: The Empty Room

This is where the ClickBrainiacs story takes its most significant turn. Across every major review platform, the evidence is the same.

  • G2: No listing found for ClickBrainiacs.
  • Capterra: Profile exists under "ClickBrainiacs Marketing Solutions." Zero user reviews. No ratings.
  • Trustpilot: No listing found.
  • SourceForge/Slashdot: Profile exists. Zero user reviews. "No User Reviews" explicitly stated.
  • SaaSworthy: Listing exists. Starting price listed as $15. No user reviews.
  • Google reviews: None found.

This is not a case of limited reviews or thin review volume, which we've flagged as concerns for other tools in this comparison. This is a complete absence of independent user validation across every platform where verified reviews are collected. For a tool founded in 2015 — making it one of the older tools in this comparison — the total lack of user feedback after nearly a decade of operation is genuinely unprecedented in this dataset.

The only case study reference found was Medaz.ro, a Romanian medical supplies e-commerce store described as having "partnered with ClickBrainiacs to increase sales and brand visibility." However, this appears on the ClickPatrol comparison page and likely refers to the agency relationship (ClickBrainiacs running their Google Ads) rather than the fraud detection software specifically.

What this means for potential buyers: You would be adopting a tool with zero public validation of its claims. No independent user has publicly confirmed that the detection works, that the dashboard delivers the promised analytics, that the automatic blocking functions reliably, or that the support responds when you need it. The one-year free trial mitigates financial risk, but it doesn't mitigate the time investment of integration, monitoring, and false positive management with an unvalidated tool.

Competitive Comparison

vs. Fraud Blocker ($29/mo): At a similar or lower price point, Fraud Blocker has hundreds of verified reviews, transparent pricing, proven detection across Google/Bing/Meta, and an established U.S. company behind it. The only area where ClickBrainiacs might edge ahead is the year-long free trial and historical analytics emphasis. For everything else, Fraud Blocker is the safer budget choice.

vs. Clixtell ($15/mo): Clixtell starts at the same low price point and includes call tracking, session recordings, and video replay that ClickBrainiacs lacks entirely. Clixtell also has verified reviews (though not abundant) and a longer public track record of active development. Clixtell is the better budget bundle.

vs. PPC Shield ($29/mo): PPC Shield is similarly small and limited (Google-only), but has G2 reviews, Trustpilot presence, and verifiable user feedback. PPC Shield's behavioral detection approach is more clearly articulated. It's a more transparent small-tool option.

vs. Click Guardian (£35/mo): Click Guardian is another small founder-led operation, but with 30+ Trustpilot reviews, years of verifiable customer relationships, and Roy Dovaston's personal reputation on the line. ClickBrainiacs has none of that social proof.

vs. ClickPatrol ($59/mo): ClickPatrol operates at a higher price tier with 800+ data point analysis, G2 leadership ratings, 9.3/10 in our comparison, and extensive review validation. The comparison isn't close on any dimension except price.

In every head-to-head matchup, the same pattern emerges: competitors at similar price points offer verified user experiences, active development evidence, and some form of independent validation that ClickBrainiacs simply doesn't have.

Privacy, Compliance, and Data Security

ClickBrainiacs provides limited information about its privacy and compliance posture. The company is based in Romania and operates within the EU, which means GDPR applies to its processing of visitor data. However, no specific GDPR compliance documentation, privacy certifications, or data processing agreements were found during research.

The residential address registration, while not inherently problematic (many bootstrapped European startups begin this way), doesn't inspire the same confidence as competitors with SOC 2 certifications (CHEQ), ISO 27001 compliance (ClickPatrol), or dedicated data processing infrastructure descriptions.

The Google Ads connection operates through MCC (My Client Center), which is the standard and relatively safe approach — it limits API access to IP exclusion list management rather than campaign editing. This is the same security model used by most competitors.

Critical Strengths

  1. Longest free trial in the comparison — 12 months, no credit card, no commitment. For risk-averse buyers, this eliminates the financial barrier entirely.
  2. Lowest starting price — at $15/month (per SaaSworthy), this is the cheapest tool in the 22-tool comparison. Even at $29/month (per source dataset), it's at the low end.
  3. No-script bot detection — tracking visitors with JavaScript disabled catches a category of bots that JS-only tools miss. This is a legitimate technical differentiator if it works as described.
  4. Automatic unblocking — the explicit emphasis on unblocking previously blocked IPs suggests awareness of false positive management, a pain point many competitors don't address.
  5. Historical data visualization — the analytics-first approach serves advertisers who need to present fraud trends to clients or stakeholders, not just block clicks.
  6. Manual controls alongside automation — the combination of automatic and manual blocking gives experienced PPC managers hands-on capability when needed.
  7. White-label reseller program — agencies can offer click fraud protection under their own brand, creating a potential revenue stream.

Critical Weaknesses

  1. Zero verified user reviews anywhere — no G2, no Capterra reviews, no Trustpilot, no SourceForge reviews. After nearly a decade of operation (founded 2015), this is the most significant red flag in the entire 22-tool comparison.
  2. Website appears dormant — the ClickBrainiacs.com site still references "AdWords" (Google rebranded to Google Ads in 2018), suggesting limited website maintenance.
  3. No API access — confirmed by multiple sources. This prevents any programmatic integration, webhook automation, or custom workflow development.
  4. Residential address registration — the company is registered to an apartment in Bucharest. After nearly ten years it suggests the operation hasn't scaled.
  5. Unfunded and unscaled — zero venture capital, zero known employees beyond the founder, ranking 1,569 out of 2,100 competitors per Tracxn.
  6. Platform coverage limited to Google Ads — some third-party sources claim multi-platform support, but the company's own website focuses exclusively on Google Ads/AdWords.
  7. No social platform protection — no Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok, or programmatic display protection.
  8. No advanced features — no session recordings, call tracking, competitive intelligence, CRM integration, or conversion attribution.
  9. Dual identity confusion — the relationship between ClickBrainiacs.com (international SaaS), WiseVision (the software platform), and ClickBrainiacs.ro (Romanian marketing agency) is unclear.
  10. No independently verified case studies — the only referenced case study (Medaz.ro) appears to relate to the agency's marketing services rather than the fraud detection software.
  11. Support quality unknown — the company claims phone and online support, but with zero user reviews, actual support quality cannot be assessed.
  12. Small threat intelligence network — without a significant user base generating detection data, the system lacks the collective intelligence that powers competitors with thousands of active installations.

The Verdict

ClickBrainiacs presents an interesting paradox. The tool costs less and offers a longer trial than anything else in this comparison. The emphasis on analytics and data visualization addresses a genuine gap — most click fraud tools focus on blocking, not understanding. The no-script tracking capability is a legitimate technical differentiator.

But software evaluation ultimately rests on evidence. After nearly a decade of operation, ClickBrainiacs has produced zero verified user reviews across every major platform. The website appears largely unchanged since the early 2020s. The company has attracted no investment, no visible team growth, and no public customer success stories attributable to the software product.

The one-year free trial means you lose nothing financially by testing it. But you do invest time in integration, monitoring, and learning a platform that may or may not deliver on its promises — time you could spend with a competitor that has hundreds or thousands of validated users confirming the tool works.

For the audience of clickfraudtool.com — advertisers making informed decisions about where to invest their fraud prevention budget — a tool without any independent validation cannot be responsibly recommended as a primary solution. If you're already using a validated tool and want to run ClickBrainiacs in parallel for comparison during that free year, there's minimal risk. As a standalone choice? The market offers too many proven alternatives at similar or modestly higher price points.

Overall Score: 5.8 / 10

ClickBrainiacs Scorecard

Category Score Notes
Detection Capability5.5/10Standard heuristic with no-script tracking; unverified effectiveness; no AI/ML confirmed
Ease of Setup6.5/10Standard tracking code + MCC; described as "more complex" than competitors
User Experience5.5/10Analytics-focused dashboard claimed; zero user feedback to validate
Value for Money8.0/10Lowest price + longest trial in comparison
Customer Support4.0/10Claims phone/online support; zero user reviews to confirm
Reporting & Analytics6.5/10Positioned as analytics-first; unverified by users
Platform Coverage4.5/10Google Ads confirmed; no social platform protection
OVERALL5.8/10Budget pricing and generous trial undermined by complete absence of user validation

Verify current status and active development at clickbrainiacs.com before committing to integration.

Explore Other Reviews

ClickPatrol

9.3/10

Editor's Choice. 800+ signals, four protection modules.

Read Review

Fraud Blocker

7.8/10

Bootstrapped underdog; Google, Microsoft, Meta from $59/mo.

Read Review

Clixtell

7.5/10

Click fraud + call tracking + session recording from $15/mo.

Read Review

This review reflects independent research conducted in February 2026. clickfraudtool.com has no commercial relationship with ClickBrainiacs, WiseVision, or any tool in this comparison. Pricing and features may have changed since publication. We particularly encourage readers to verify the current status of ClickBrainiacs' active development before committing to integration.

Ready to Stop Wasting Budget on Fake Clicks?

Compare the top 22 click fraud prevention tools side by side.

Compare All Tools